Yes, but ain’t this also kinda like phrenology? I see it more as western science having been unbalanced, overemphasizing ‘objectivity’ now accepting ‘subjectivity’ ~~~~~~~~~~ e.g., Buddhists wearing hairnets for brain scans to measure where blood goes when a meditator envisions X ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ with now an over-emphasis on the brain. Eventually, they’ll come to realize, for example, what it means that the 20% of the brain’s activity actually affects the human heart, whereas 80% of the human heart’s messages affect the human brain. And where is the chemical cocktail for charity given in order pump up self-congratulatory ego? But ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ heck, yes! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ this is all very interesting.